Optimal Police Station Placement in Atlanta

Executive Summary

This study provides data-driven recommendations for the optimal location and composition of police stations in Atlanta. By clustering neighborhoods based on crime type, traffic incidents, and demographic data, we optimized station placement to minimize response time. Our approach successfully reduced the average distance between police stations and crime locations by 40% across all patrol zones, enhancing law enforcement efficiency and resource allocation.

1. Rising Crime Rates in Atlanta

Crime rates in Atlanta have been increasing, placing significant strain on law enforcement resources. Optimizing police station locations can improve response times and overall public safety. Existing research primarily focuses on station placement near crime hotspots but lacks detailed considerations such as staffing composition. Since different neighborhoods experience distinct crime patterns, our analysis provides tailored staffing recommendations for each station.

2. Crime, Traffic Incidents, and Demographics Dataset

Our study analyzed 101 Atlanta neighborhoods using the following datasets:

Crime Data Traffic Incident Data Demographic Data
Time Period 2015-2019 2015-2019 2019
Total Records 136,175 204,336 103
Attributes 10 22 20
Data Sources Atlanta Police Department (APD) Atlanta Department of Transportation (ATL DOT) DataNexus

3. Methodology and Findings

Clustering

We refined the dataset by selecting variables with a standard deviation greater than 0.01 and applied K-means clustering to categorize neighborhoods based on crime patterns. The optimal number of clusters was determined to be K=4 using the elbow method. The neighborhoods within the same cluster were grouped into police patrol zones.

Neighborhood Clustering Results Optimized Police Patrol Zones

Optimization

We formulated a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) to minimize the distance between candidate police station locations and crime sites. Potential station sites were selected at the intersections of a mile-wide grid overlaying each patrol zone. Crimes were categorized into violent and non-violent incidents, weighted at 0.7 and 0.3, respectively, to prioritize proximity to violent crime locations.

\[ minimize \sum_{i \in I} x_i \left( \sum_{j \in J} 0.7 \times D_{H_{ij}} + \sum_{k \in K} 0.3 \times D_{L_{ik}} \right) \]

Subject to:

\[ \sum_{i \in I} x_i = n \]

The binary variable \( x_i \) indicates whether a candidate location \( i \) is selected for a police station. The parameter \( D_{H_{ij}} \) represents the distance from location \( i \) to crime site \( j \), while \( D_{L_{jk}} \) measures the distance from \( j \) to crime site \( k \). The parameter \( n \) represents the required number of police stations for each patrol zone.

4. Evaluation

Performance Evaluation Chart

The optimization successfully reduced the average response distance by 40%, leading to a more efficient deployment of law enforcement resources. The model demonstrated that strategic station placement significantly enhances police presence in high-crime areas while minimizing overall travel time.

5. Interactive Data Visualization

The following interactive tool allows users to explore key statistics and clustering results. Due to data limitations, interactive functionality is restricted for the airport neighborhood. The visualization is powered by D3.js for dynamic, web-based interaction. For an optimal experience, please rotate your device to landscape mode.

Interactive Clustering Map

Locations




Map Coloring

Box Plot

Top 5 Important features for Clustering